Content Diversity Tracker
Hyde & Hare
2026-09-22

What to make next

£5,397
running now
54 ads live
66.8%
claimed with no proof at all
asserted only, see how it proves it

Who we are reaching, and at what stage

Inferred, not recorded. Our ad names have no slot for persona or awareness stage, so these come from what each ad ARGUES, through a stated mapping in the client config with a reason on every rule, sourced to the persona doc. It is the weakest source we have: a tag written at launch would replace it outright. Read it as "this is who this creative is written at", not as who Meta delivered it to.

Unaware Problem-aware Solution-aware Product-aware Most awareTotal
The Forever-Home Curatorcore self-purchaser
17.3%
62.7%
6.8%
86.8%
The Considered Gift-Giverthe Q4 engine
0
The Statement-Piece Investor£300+ anchor piece
1.9%
The Collector-Completerexisting customer, most aware
3.5%
3.5%

Zero spend against The Considered Gift-Giver. Nothing in the account argues to this persona at all.

No creative at all for: Unaware. Coverage is a creative question, never a delivery one: the fix is to make that ad, never to build an audience or an ad set for it.

What kind of ad each persona actually gets

The Forever-Home Curator
Slice of life 40.5% · To camera 20.3% · Teaching 20.2% · Showcase 8.8%
The Statement-Piece Investor
Slice of life 99.1% · Showcase 0.9%
The Collector-Completer
Demo 77.6% · Showcase 22.4%

What our ads actually do

The move each ad makes on the viewer: talks to them, shows them, teaches them, opens a box in front of them. Not what it argues and not how it looks, just what it does. Tap any i for what a lane counts as and, more usefully, what it does not. Spend-weighted, last 30 days. A lane can hold plenty of budget while every ad in it is months old, so the ageing badge matters as much as the bar.

A slice of life, no address
37.0%23 ads
Person speaking to camerastale 127d
17.7%2 ads
Teaching, steps, how-tostale 127d
17.6%7 ads
Product presented, no story
9.4%8 ads
Shows it workingstale 195d
9.1%5 ads
Proof is the creativestale 288d
4.8%2 ads
Skit, humour, a bitstale 304d
1.7%3 ads
Unboxing, the revealstale 288d
1.7%3 ads
Enumerated, text-ledstale 563d
1.2%1 ad

Nothing at all in: Comparison, before & after · A story with beats · Not stated. These are not failures, they are untested. An absent lane leaves no trace in the data, which is exactly why the checklist is fixed rather than derived from what is already running.

Empty by choice: Reacting, replying. Parked for this brand with a reason on file, so they are not in the build list. Parking matters as much as the gap: it stops the report reading as a demand for twelve of everything.

What moved since 2026-09-15

Bars sit either side of the zero rule, so direction is position, not colour. A lane shrinking is not automatically bad. The two flags mark the cases worth a decision.

A slice of life, no address
-13.115 → 23 ads
Person speaking to camera
+9.22 → 2 ads
Teaching, steps, how-to
+3.78 → 7 ads
Shows it working
+1.55 → 5 ads
Enumerated, text-led
+1.21 → 1 ads
Product presented, no story
-0.96 → 8 ads
Unboxing, the reveal
-0.93 → 3 ads

Who carries it

Whose voice or face the viewer thinks is talking to them: a real customer, the founder, a creator, an unseen narrator, or deliberately nobody at all. Tap any i for what each one counts as. Observed on its own evidence (the serving page, then labels, then copy) and never derived from the kind of ad, which is what made this a duplicate check in the old audit.

Nobody on screen
49.7%29 ads
Named creator
32.9%12 ads
Real customer
13.8%6 ads
Unknown (not labelled)
2.3%3 ads
Founder
0.9%2 ads
Employee / maker
0.4%2 ads

What it looks like

How polished or staged it feels as a piece of craft: shot on a phone, styled in a real room, a controlled studio, or made rather than shot. Kept separate from who is in it and what it does, so "founder talking head video" and "founder talking head UGC" differ on one value instead of being two permanent buckets.

Styled but a real setting
68.6%33 ads
Raw, phone-shot, feed-native
17.6%12 ads
Studio, controlled
7.4%3 ads
Designed, not shot
5.9%2 ads
Real process, observed
0.4%2 ads
Not stated
0.1%2 ads

How it proves it

The evidence behind whatever the ad claims: a customer saying it, the rating, a press clipping, a demonstration, a comparison, the maker's own word, or a checkable detail. Asserted only means the ad states its claim and shows nothing behind it. Read from the copy, the messenger and the device, and from the creative where a hand correction has read an overlay.

Asserted only
66.8%32 ads
Shown working
26.6%12 ads
Reviews or rating
5.2%4 ads
The maker says it
1.3%4 ads
A customer says it
0.0%2 ads

What to build next

The emptiest cells under the arguments this account already spends on. Absent lanes get two to four shots, not one: at a roughly 5% winner rate a single ad cannot tell you whether the lane failed or the execution did.

ArgumentWhat it doesLive now
Sensory / product desireComparison, before & afternothing
Sensory / product desireA story with beatsnothing
Features & benefitsComparison, before & afternothing
Features & benefitsA story with beatsnothing
Identity / ritual / aspirationComparison, before & afternothing
Identity / ritual / aspirationA story with beatsnothing
Education / how it worksComparison, before & afternothing
Education / how it worksA story with beatsnothing
Social proof / testimonialComparison, before & afternothing
Social proof / testimonialA story with beatsnothing
Urgency / offerComparison, before & afternothing
Urgency / offerA story with beatsnothing

Method